Post by denisI don't hate Queers because of anything the Bible says I hate You
because You're a bunch of ShitLicking AssRamming CockSucking Sniveling
Crybaby Faggots! I know a bunch of you limp wristed AidsBait-AnalCunts
are gonna start sniveling "Homophobe" snivel snivel... WRONG Sphincter
Cunts it's "HomoPath" I'm not scared of you Ass Bandits, I Just
Fucking Hate You!!! Oh by the way I cheer whenever I hear about
another one of you Slimy NutDumpsters succumbing to AIDS I just wish
it were a whole lot more Virulent!
dolf: “Still Time To Vote: Usenet Kook Hall Of Fame!”
Gary L Burnore (***@databasix.com): “I’ve [SLAP] no brain.
[plonk]”
dolf: “You databasix.com guys are nothing but piss-heads.
Are you the dick Fred Hall mouths off about?
Sorry mate, no cunts allowed. Only those blokes with testicles can vote.”
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler (***@databasix.com): “Yes, boys and
girls, men and women, Dolf Boek has made his triumphal return to
alt.usenet.kooks, dropping 500 line screedbombs across the virtual
landscape. The same Dolf 'Qolon' Boek who is the proud owner of these
AUK awards:
72 Raisins Crackpot Religion Award January 2006
Unabomber Surprise March 2006
Tony Sidaway Memorial Drama Queen Award April 2006
Goofy Azzed Babboon December 2007
Welcome back, Dolf! Perhaps the Grand Wizard will add you to his stable
of fine kooks!”
Craig Chilton [www.TravelForPay.org]: “Is Dolf your mother, father,
husband, wife, son or daughter? the reason I ask is because of the
special attention you pay to his action, the listing of all his awards
plus your affirmation that you wish him/her to join you in the Grand
Wizard stable of Kooks of what ever sort you are among.”
Fred Hall (***@databasix.com): “Incoherent response noted.
Craig Chilton [www.TravelForPay.org]: “It does exceed the third grade
reading level. I'll remember that next time I post something you might
be inclined to read.”
Fred Hall (***@databasix.com): “Tell me again, Craig, why you think
necrophilia should be legal.”
Craig Chilton [www.TravelForPay.org]: “You're dying to know, aren't you?”
Fred Hall (***@databasix.com): “Evasion noted. You and Boek have
quite a bit in common.”
dolf: "Barbarism!"
Craig Chilton [www.TravelForPay.org]: “So do YOU and I.”
Fred Hall (***@databasix.com): “Further evasion noted and giggled at.”
dolf: “How’s the testicles?”
Fenced In World (GRINDR) 19 yo: “Fine thx”
dolf: “Good to hear.
Knock knock!”
Fenced In World (GRINDR) 19 yo: “I don’t play games.”
dolf: “It’s pleasant talk boy--so when you fuck remember what I said.”
Fenced In World (GRINDR) 19 yo: “What”
% (***@gmail.com): “Looks like newbies to me.”
sgt.preston (***@gmail.com): “Naaaahh.............just Fred's
"dirty Socks" !!”
dolf: “Are you attempting to unlawfully represent yourself as a member
of the Police Service or Armed Forces?”
Barry OGrady (***@hotmail.com.au): “
http://www.ratbags.com/loon/mailbox/dolf.htm
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2002/92.html”
Fred Hall (***@databasix.com): “Ah, yes, the Boek k00ksuit. Too funny.”
dolf: “I will not make any submission to the present Parliamentary
Senate enquiry, because I am going to sue Peter Bowditch, the Sceptics
Society and the State of Victoria et al.
And I will visit the same recompense upon all and each of you here now.”
Fred Hall (***@databasix.com): “Glad we don't have that problem in
New Zealand.”
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. (***@home.fåke): “Learn how to trim, you
freaking, rude jerk!”
Fidem Turbare (the non-existent atheist goddess): “Teaching children to
question things is the best defen[c]e teachers can give them against the
dark arts that is religion. Just as they should question evolution so
they should question religion--Les Hellawell”
dolf: “When I was a child I was the only person who didn't believe in
God that I knew. Everyone else had either been born into one of the
major brands of Christianity, or at very least they'd accepted, by a
process of social osmosis, the idea of God, even if they remained, for
all practical purposes, indifferent.
And that's the good thing about the recent ascendancy of our belief, or
rather our disbelief. For atheism does not presuppose, let alone impose,
a set of views. All it does is unite us in religious scepticism about
the existence of gods. Gods plural because, of course, even within one
of the religious brands quite a few variations on God are made available.
So today is important because it tells people that atheism is all right.
I didn't know it was all right. This greatly intensified my loneliness
as a child. When I tried to tell my grandmother my doubts - I was raised
by grandparents on a tiny farm--she boxed my ears. Ah, the solitary
dissidents, the lonely thinkers, the people who may be the only
disbeliever in a family or community. To that extent we need to borrow
from our enemies and have some missionary zeal. Whilst we should avoid
messiahs we need disciples to go out and spread the word and seek
converts. But as I'll be arguing this morning we must also have to use
our intellectual convictions to calm down the frenzies of faith.
I see some parallels here between atheism and homosexuality.'The love
that dare not speak its name' as Oscar Wilde pronounced it. Leading to
millions living their life in the closet. Atheism was, and to a large
extent remains, the view that dare not speak its name. And it's only
recently that I've observed atheists coming out. Finally confident
enough to be, to borrow a gay slogan, loud and proud (Incidentally,
spare a thought for gay atheists).
But in becoming prouder and louder I want to argue that we should not be
too loud. And that we should not overestimate our importance as the
tectonic plates of religion move slowly, rubbing against each other to
cause mental and social earthquakes. By all means let us congratulate
each other - but let us not fall prey to hubris.
The disintegration of many a previously monolithic faith cannot be
attributed or credited to us. Roman Catholicism founders because
conservative prelates have tried to undo the progress of Vatican II. The
faithful refuse to comply with anachronistic instructions on the pill
and the condom.
They're embarrassed by their Church's archaic stance on women and
appalled by the ongoing attempts to cover up paedophilia scandals.
Others bitterly resent the undermining of liberation theology--those
valiant social justice campaigns. Or the stacking of the pulpits of
Western Europe with arch conservative priests from Poland.
The woes of the Catholic Church are self inflicted. We've barely laid a
glove on them. Ditto for the Anglican Church which is increasingly
stacked to the rafters with agnostics while Australian Anglicanism and
US Episcopalians self destruct over the issues of women priests and
continuing ecclesiastic homophobia.
But even the foundering of major faiths doesn't necessarily swell our
numbers. There's evidence that the major faiths have atomised,
Balkanised into the ongoing nonsense of cults, the New Age and pseudo
science. Religious energy, like energy itself, cannot be destroyed. It
tends to morph into new forms.
Twenty years ago Dick Smith and I aided and abetted the creation of the
Australian Sceptics, the local branch of CSICOP - the Committee for the
Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal. CSICOP deals with
displaced religiosity. Much of the loss of the market share for big
brand religious beliefs was split up between the Pentecostalists with
their shopping mall religions or the fast faith franchises, largely
generated in California, right alongside the dream factory of Hollywood.
Two worlds that overlap to an extraordinary extent.
Far from winning, the Sceptics and CSICOP have lost ground to
Millenarian and Shirley Macleanish madness. Turn on cable or free to air
telly and you'll see an ever increasing number of programs based on
paranormal detectives while John Edwards and his fellow frauds talk to
the dead. And the amount of space in newspapers given to astrology has
by no means decreased. We live in a parallel universe to these people.
The beliefs and behaviours that came from the Baptismal font in
mainstream faiths have simply deformed and reformed.
Yes, atheism is on the march in the US, according to statistics. But
we're starting from a very, very low base. And we should look across the
census figures at the equally dramatic growth of Islam in the US. It's
not coming from immigration but from conversion. Conversion within the
prison system! Malcolm X and Mohammed Ali certainly started something.
So beware of triumphalism. Over the last half century I've learnt that
my euphoria about atheism's progress, inevitable to us, about the
advance of science leading to the retreat of God, was wildly optimistic.
Yet the triumph of science, even in the scientifically triumphant US,
has failed to convince the vast majority of Americans that evolution is
a fact rather than a blasphemy.
Members of religions see atheists as their mortal enemies. Not immortal,
of course, because atheists don't linger on through all eternity. We
simply return to the nothingness that preceded our birth. Religions'
immortal enemy is religion. We might shake our puny fists at the
Vatican, at Islamic fundamentalism, at the religious right who
turbo-charge the US Republican party - but it is the ancient and modern
squabbles, the murderous contests between faiths and within them, that
dwarf our dissent.
Hitchens, Dawkins and the rest of us are, at best, at worst, the most
minor of irritants. The ancient and recent Christian crusades against
Islam, the titanic struggle of the Protestant heretics against Mother
Church, the recent internecine horrors in the Balkans, the genocidal
hatred of the Jews incited by Martin Luther that evolved into Holocaust
- these are the big stories. Savanarola was burnt at the stake by fellow
Catholics - as was Joan of Arc. Atheists neither gathered the faggots
nor fanned the flames. When religions are not at war with each other
they tear themselves apart.
We cannot take the credit for the dramatic decline in religious
observation in most Western nations. At last count, 90 per cent of
Australian Catholics were not attending Mass. But that's not because of
our arguments. It's because of their arguments with their priests,
bishops and the more recent Popes, particularly those from Poland and
Germany. Take us out of the equation and that rapid erosion will
continue, perhaps accelerate.
It's even observable in the United States amongst the Pentacostalists.
Just as the hippies were a reaction against stultifying and emotionally
stunted parents, a great many children of US fundamentalists are
shrugging off the dogmas of Mum and Dad. At very least they're moving at
least fractionally towards the left. And American religious excess has
certainly helped dim the flames of faith as far away as Western Europe.
But it is important for us to realise - and let me borrow a couple of
metaphors from the realms of cutlery - that it's self inflicted wounds
that have done the most damage - particularly the Christian variants -
than the cut and thrust of the atheists' arguments. We are, perhaps, the
beneficiaries of this process but we cannot claim the credit.
Nor have we laid a glove on Islam or Hinduism. They are indifferent to
us and our arguments. No, indifferent isn't the word, as in some Muslim
countries our lives might well be at risk. You could argue, perhaps,
that secular atheistic Jews are in constant conflict with the orthodox
and ultra orthodox in Israel. Not that they seem to have won too many
rounds (After all, Israel began its life as a secular state and, over
the generations, has had to abandon territory to the religious right.
They mightn't yield territory to the Palestinians but the religiously
xenophobic don't seem to have lost much influence).
So perhaps we should reconsider our role, our allotted tasks, as people
who believe in none of this nonsense we might see ourselves as honest
brokers. Negotiate in their all consuming conflicts. Given our
anthropological detachment from Messianic and Milleranian madness, from
the boiling hatreds between Sunni and Shiia, we might share the role of
the Norwegians. They're not particularly powerful or numerous but fight
above their weight in hosing down dangerous situations. Confronted by
rabid religiosity people who don't believe could try to ameliorate the
hatreds of those who do. Mind you, you could mount an argument that
that's exactly what the likes of us have been doing for the past few
centuries. As to trying to convert the believer to disbelief - I tried
that for the last half century and found it not only a fruitless but
thankless task.
A confession I must admit to is being swept up in a religion as a
teenager. I became, during the 1950s, when the Cold War was at its
coldest and McCarthyism at its height, a member of the Australian
Communist Party. I was 15 when I signed up and 18 when I was kicked out.
And one of the reasons I lost my faith in atheistic communism was
because it revealed itself as a parody of the Catholic Church.
Catholicism had Rome, Communists had Moscow. Catholics had God the
Father and his son Jesus. Communists had Karl Marx as God and Lenin as
the saviour. They had the Bible, we had Das Kapital. They'd had Martin
Luther and we'd had Trotsky. Both of us had forms of dogma, the show
trial, confession, heresy, expulsion. Both published an Index of books
not to read.
I remember noticing the eerie parallels between cheap Catholic tracts
sold by the Catholic's Evidence Guild and cheap Marxist tracts sold at
the international book shop perhaps a mile from where we are today. One
tract would warn against heresy. The other against revisionism. One
would have the upturned bearded face of Christ on the cover, the other
the upturned bearded face of Lenin. Towards the end of my involvement in
the party I used to swap them over, putting communist tracts into the
racks surrounding a Gothic column in St Patrick's Cathedral - and
smuggling the Catholic counterparts into the small Marxist bookshop. God
knows, Marx knows, what happened as a consequence. How many Catholics
were converted to communism, how many Commos accepted Christ as their
own personal saviour.
I mention these parallels to dramatise that the atheist can be as
susceptible to authority and dogma as the Catholic. And that's one of
the reasons I differ in emphasis from Christopher and Richard. Just as I
differed totally from Christopher on the war in Iraq. I've been an
atheist for 66 years. I became atheist at the age of five, a decade
before I knew what an atheist was. Before I'd even heard the word. But
as a little boy, the son of a Christian minister, I realised I couldn't
believe, that the notion of God was totally redundant. The great
argument for God was that there had to be a Creation, a beginning. Some
sort of cosmic orgasm that got things going. But my objection was
simple. If God was the beginning who began God?
When I was discovering why I was not a communist I read Bertrand
Russell's Why I Am Not a Christian. In it he explained that he was 18 or
19 when he asked himself that all important question. If God was the
beginning who began God? And it was at that moment that he lost the last
vestiges of faith.
But I understand the yearning for belief. The poignancy, the wanting to
believe. It is driven, principally, by the fear of death. Christians
postulate a lopsided creation in which personal existence goes on and on
and on for billions of years in Heaven. Yet that creation had a sudden,
magical beginning with God.
I realised, at the age of five, that I'd already been dead forever.
Because what happened before birth - all those billions of years of
non-existence was identical to what happened after death.
Now, although I share much of the anger, indignation and rage that
Hitchens and Dawkins express I am well aware of that vastation of terror
that greets anyone who considers their mortality.
I started writing about that terror in columns almost half a century
ago. It was, I believe, the first time these issues were raised in an
Australian newspaper. As I took advantage of the fact that they were
evolving from newspapers to viewspapers. Unable to compete with the
urgency and immediacy of electronic media newspapers were opening their
pages to interpretation of last night's news and could be encouraged to
give space to philosophical meanderings. So I used that window of
opportunity to start discussing, in newspapers like The Age, The
Australian and the Sydney Morning Herald, the notion of living in a
meaningless universe, without author or purpose - its only destiny to go
cold and dark in obedience to the second law of thermo dynamics.
The notions of personal mortality, our denial of death or its burial in
euphemism - are central to most religious belief.
For a while the attacks in response were deafening and strident but,
little by little, I got a sort of a dialogue going with people of faith
- which I still find valid. Because on a vast variety of the social
issues - the social justice issues that I care about - people whose
beliefs I find ridiculous can become my colleagues.
A decade ago Australia went through the most appalling wave of bigotry
in the way it addressed the so-called problems of a few refugees.
Building on the paranoia of white Australia, the Pauline Hansons and
John Howards - and sadly some on my side of politics - prove that under
the veneer of tolerance Australians remained deeply racist. On that
issue amongst the first people to sign up for justice for refugees were
Jesuit intellectuals and Josephite nuns. Just as Jews played a major
role in the civil rights movement in the US - yes, largely secular Jews
but nonetheless operating within a Jewish religious tradition - just as
Jews joined with black leaders like Luther King to overthrow America's
apartheid, members of Australian religious organisations (by no means
enough of them, in very small numbers) manned the barricades.
As they did on Aboriginal rights. As they do on a wide variety of
issues. While it's true that atheists have to put up with bullshit from
the religious that deny us any claim to ethics or morality we must not
make the same mistake. There are atheists who refuse to accept the
possibility that Christians, for example, can be taken seriously as
social reformers. They argue that they do it for the religious
counterpart to frequent flyer points. In its crudest form, they argue
that only the atheist can be truly ethical. Well, tell that to the
Reverend Martin Luther King or the many black and white Christians who
played a leading part in overthrowing the repulsive race laws that had
been established by the Dutch Reform Church and justified by their
distorted theology. We saw much the same thing with slavery. Christians,
even Quakers, could justify the slave trade. Nonetheless, Christians
following Wilberforce worked mightily to destroy it.
Atheists, finally, don't believe. But that doesn't make us better or
nobler or finer people. At least, not necessarily. Many of the great
crimes of the 20th century can be laid as much at our door as at the
doors of the churches. Atheists, like Christians, can be the best or
worst of people. We do not have a monopoly on intelligence, on ethics or
decency. Yes, their beliefs - whether New Age nonsense or full blown
Catholicism - range from the ludicrous to the loathsome. Yes, the
Catholic Church's sickening attitude to human sexuality leads to
paedophilia on a monstrous scale.
Its nonsense about virgin births and immaculate conceptions and the
superiority of celibacy so distorts the human psyche that, decades ago,
when making a film on prostitution and the sex industry, I discovered an
overwhelming majority of prostitutes had had convent educations. And
when I pointed this out in a series of newspaper columns, linking it to
similar findings in the UK, which found that a remarkably high
percentage of men and women in the sex trades were Roman Catholics, led
to me being the target of a Catholic fatwah. On one particular Sunday an
edict was read out from every Catholic pulpit in this country saying
that it was a sin to read any newspaper that printed me or to listen to
any radio station that broadcast me. And I hadn't even mentioned the
paedophilia problem because, at the time, I didn't know it existed.
But when I look at these phenomena I am not moved to hate Roman
Catholics so much as I am to pity them. And I want atheists to view
these people, dragooned into belief since childhood, or coming upon them
later in life as a consequence of the most profound of fears, the fear
of death, with a degree of understanding and compassion.
It's true that such tolerance has never been extended to us and remains
singularly absent in most major religions. The atheist remains an
ultimate outsider, someone to be demonised, feared and detested. But
that's their problem, not ours.
The current frenzy for faith, and fundamentalism, may be as I've
occasionally speculated, the storm before the lull. The last gasp of
religion as it yields to the mighty analysis and discoveries of science.
That might be the case. But the confidence that I had in my teens - that
religion would be dead by the end of the 20th century - that the
synagogues, cathedrals and mosques would be museums - was foolhardy in
the extreme. Indeed, while the religious monoliths did seem to be
crumbling, the spontaneous combustion of ever more foolish faiths in the
supernatural smorgasbord of cults, largely created in California, and in
the tenacity of superstition to remain alive and well even in its
trickle-down form of those astrological features in daily newspapers,
remains awesome.
Furthermore I'm assailed by people who argue that while God didn't
exist, doesn't exist, he she or it is coming into existence through the
new technologies. That the internet is the harbinger of a vast new form
of consciousness that will fill the galaxies and will, in some strange
way, neutralise the second law of thermo-dynamics. Now I think this is
twaddle. But it shows that even amongst people who claim to be totally
secular, who would see themselves as being atheists of some degree,
there's always a danger of creating a new ism or ology that, like
communism at its worst, may have a disastrous impact.
Yes, we must rage against religious extremism. But we must also be
intelligent enough to understand its origins, in the individual and in
society. We are not strong enough, we don't have sufficient numbers to
change the balance of power. The fact that religious belief may have
evaporated in western Europe, that it really ceased to exist in Japan,
that does not mean that we've won. It simply means that in many areas
religion has lost. But giving up on religious belief is not the same as
becoming a thoughtful, highly rational atheist. There may be 2,500 of us
here today but we are still a tiny minority.
Most people who've abandoned religion have not embraced the thoughts and
values we might try and articulate. They've taken up shopping. They are
dulling the pain of existence in the mall, by buying things they don't
need with the credit cards they can't afford. Or they're dulling the
pain in alcohol or narcosis. Or they're just sitting in front of the
telly or the computer screen bathing themselves in violent drama or
hyper violent games. In pornography or the pornographies of violence.
Don't be fooled into thinking that we're at the edge of victory. That
would be a delusion. It concerns me that by becoming too arrogant, too
strident, too aggressive we will stultify rather than intensify debate.
I've known Christopher Hitchens for decades and know how he operates. In
any area, on no matter what he's tackling, he has two positions. On or
off. And when he's on he can be absolutely exhilarating.
I remember chortling with delight at his attacks on Mother Theresa -
when he called for Henry Kissinger to be tried as a war criminal. But I
was horrified when he threw his lot in with the Bush administration and
the neo cons. Mind you, many of the neo cons started their intellectual
life as Christopher did, as Trotskyites. In other words whenever
Christopher is writing something he cannot help but pound the keyboard
like a pianist playing one of the noisier works of Rachmaninoff. His
response to what he correctly sees as Islamist fascism brooks no
argument and takes no prisoners. It goes straight to shock and awe, to
the botched invasion of Iraq and ends up with up to a million dead (Not
that we'll ever know the figure because a body count has always been
studiously avoided) and Abu Ghraib. And Christopher remains
unapologetic. Because that's the way he thinks and that's the way he
writes. And nobody does that sort of thing better. Much of what Richard
writes and says and broadcasts has the same... energy.
I propose, if you like, a third way while recognising how devalued that
notion has become in politics. But a willingness to sit down and talk to
these people who are not necessarily our enemies and who may, on a raft
of issues, be our friends. Sometimes their efforts to be our friends are
grotesque and ludicrous. I think of the Templeton prizewinners, the long
list of scientists, almost all of whom I have either known or
interviewed at length, cop a million dollars for building bridges of
understanding - usually misunderstandings between science and Christian
beliefs. But when it comes to human suffering, whilst I can see that
much of it has been exacerbated by religion, we must accept the reality
that we need 'em on our side if we are to effect social change.
There was a time when, for example, the Christian world seemed wholly
unsympathetic to the climate change crisis. But there is now a strong
movement, within Christianity, to see the destruction of the planet as a
form of blasphemy.
People of religious faith are, in my view, more to be pitied than
blamed. They are, I believe, victims of the faiths they profess. But
there are countless millions of them who are decent human beings. As
decent as the 2,500 gathered here today. And I return to that notion of
the atheist as honest broker. Of the atheist as go-between. Of the
atheist who can sit down with Protestant, Catholic, Sunni and Shiia,
Muslim and Hindu and try to talk some sense into them.
And I've done it. I've conducted little experiments along these lines by
getting myself invited to some very strange places. For example,
Australia's leading Pentecostal ministers--running vast churches--had me
along to talk to them about atheism. I described myself as a mangy old
lion in a den of Christians and got a very good hearing. And by the end
of the discussion I like to think that they would not be so quick to
condemn, demonise of vilify atheists in the future.
In running this line at this conference I realise that it will not be
popular, that it's much more fun to shake the fist and pound the table.
But in a world where the religious have done so much of that for
millennia, and continue to do it in the 21st century, somebody's got to
be sane. And sanity is, or should be, a characteristic of atheism.
And may the blessings of Bertrand Russell rain down upon you.
Footnote: While I do not believe in the resurrection of Jesus Christ I'm
here to tell you that other apparent corpses have a remarkable ability
to resurrect themselves. Only moments ago Obama's victory signalled the
end of the Republican Party. Now, a little over a year after his
inauguration day, the Republicans are reviving. Not by compromising, not
by changing the packaging, but by becoming even madder than ever. The
Rush Limbaughs, Sarah Palins, Tea Parties, Fox News and its loony
luminaries, are looking forward to the mid-terms where there will be a
bounce back. The pundits, as ever, were totally unreliable. Ditto for
the death of religion. It rises like Lazarus, like the phoenix from the
ashes. In some cases it does some repackaging. So that Creationism is
slightly redefined as intelligent design. But much of it goes in the
opposite direction, becoming even more reckless and Fundamentalist, more
mediaeval. Faith, blind faith in all its forms, in all its weird and
wacky variations, behaves like a virus. Just when you think you've got
it on the run it mutates into something even more infectious, even
deadlier. And the immune system of human societies isn't getting
significantly stronger.
In the last century 150 million people died in wars and genocides. We
would argue that religion played a major role in those statistics.
There's little evidence of it ameliorated fanaticism and much that
exacerbated it.
How will we fare in the 21st century? It[’s] certainly not off to an
encouraging start. Truly world wars may be fading but the
intensification of local, nationalist, civil and other forms of conflict
are on the increase. And we have yet to see what will happen when,
inevitably, terrorist groups, motivated by religion, get their hands on
biological or nuclear weapons. When one or more of scores of would-be
Saddam Husseins really do get weapons of mass destruction.
Yes, there are pockets of progress. But they're offset by black holes of
brutal beliefs. It's a fight that's been going on for centuries,
millennia. And it's not over yet.” [© 2010 Phillip Adams, edited version
of a speech given at the Global Atheist Convention]
Fred Hall (***@databasix.com): “Did you enjoy your stay in the hospital?
[trim, for ClosetBoi]”
Cujo DeSockpuppet (***@petitmorte.net): “So howz the
marsupial-molesting working out for you, freak?”
Cujo: The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"Ad hominem, when it comes to psychology I am a genius. This can be seen
by the wriggling all spinics such as you do--and snipping of logical
definitions that trap you instead of you logically answering
them.”--Edmond 'taking his ego for a ride' Wollmann
Gary L Burnore (***@databasix.com): “Already boring, ALready
killfiled. When the cancelbots start in, I shall laugh.”
Rick Sabian / Checkmate (***@gmail.com /
***@The.Edge): “He's already in my stable of fine plonked
kooks.” [Checkmate: KotAGoR XXXIV, Hammer of Thor February 2012,
Copyright © 2012 all rights reserved]
“[I]ts usually the lesser intelligent person , that comments on the more
intelligent person's , lack of intelligents”--Dave Keating, AKA
"Squiggles" the assworm, AKA %, explaining intelligence
“[W]e all think what we do has major significants"--Squiggles explains
why he spends so much time on Usenet... and why he can't play Scrabble
dolf: “Don't over act Rick Sabian alias Checkmate, I've got enough
quotes for my book thanks.
And I reserve all my rights as well.
That you are engaged in criminal activity towards me, as deliberate
character assassination of me by abusive, offensive conduct as
indictable crime worthy of attention and action being power of arrest by
your relative police jurisdictions.”
% (***@gmail.com): "[I]'m saying [I]'m everything."
dolf: "0% proof! God is a spirit."
% (***@gmail.com): “It sounds like you're not having a happy day.”
dolf: “Don't you think that if Zimmerman's story was contradicted by the
physical evidence the police would have charged him?”
Old Jinglebollocks (***@gmail.com): “Doesn't matter any more.
Can't be bothered even to read what you bums are writing on Usenet.
Fuck ye, the whole damned lot o' ye.”
I thought Jamie Rowe was discriminatory in the manner by which he
undertook his seeking of housemates in Liverpool Street with Gay
Share-space was indulgently disrespectful of the person's dignity as
autonomic right. That collectively these radio personalities are by
their fascist dog commentary, not mindful of duty to State. I also
called the Chief Commissioner office with that same calmness of mind--it
is therefore dishonest to convey it as otherwise.
Flag NOT Fag Wa[i]ver (***@aohell.org): “Many targets, one bomb.
B O O M !”
dolf: “...and I want to call in an airstrike...is that wrong?”
Defence Minister Stephen Swan in addressing the media on 7 March 2012,
over ADF shenanigans does raise some matters of parallelism and I do
note as advice in which I agree.
On 13 March 2012 I followed my community health nurse and confidant’s
recent example of determined conduct as a statement of dissatisfaction
made in resignation and contempt over the unlawful character and the
frenzied, brutalising, hate filled manner by which the New South Wales
Police Service and Saint Vincent’s Acute Care Team have conducted
themselves in my affairs.
Following their advice that these persons were seeking to make a
submission to a Magistrate’s Court in order to forcibly gain entry into
my apartment and access me as to the nature, condition and circumstances
of my psychological health--they again resorted to unlawful, threatening
and unbridled aggression in their conduct outside my premises and a week
later they murdered a Brazilian youth (certainly not a Brazil Holland
hero) by tasering him in a circumstance of mistaken identity over an
alleged theft of biscuits (a wafer perhaps?).
- http://www.manhunt.net/profile/BRAZIL_HOLLAND
Manhunt (Brazil_Holland): Age: 34, Position: Top, Height: 6’0”, Build:
Twink, Ethnicity: Mixed, Hair: Buzzed, Eyes: Brown, Cock: 9" (Uncut)
Duke Duck Gumbo (***@cox.net): “I'll leave it to you and your
infinite wisdom to explain why it isn't a case of creation by an
intelligent creator. Heeheehee.”
Barry OGrady (***@hotmail.com.au): “First you need to prove the
above happened. Then you need to prove it had something to do with a
magical and undetectable deity. Heeheehee.”
dolf: “Did you like my trick? Let me spell it out properly.
I am asking for a guy to show me affection which is mindful of the life
circumstance that I have been subject to--which as adverse conduct is
the cause for that compensation as wealth.
If you are not mindful of an appropriate conduct which is required for
that, then you ought to refrain from any disrespectful conduct.
And unfortunately you have struck the wrong chord by your comments so far:
"Nope [I'm not aware of your opportunities.] I don't look for a guy with
money, I only look for their time or love and vice versa occurs."
"Anyways! Sleep time, I want to learn (***) soon, thought you were going
to be my mentor? Sorry, been busy with Uni, two more semesters and I'm
done finally!"
"I'd rather be poor to be honest than rich, I was in that arrangement
previously, ugh...material things were nice for a while, didn't make me
any happier."
And neither do you have any idea of the extent of the opportunity.
I'm not buying a husband but I don't want one who isn't capable by their
own virtue of manhood in being by my side whilst I pursue my opportunities.”
Nurse Fanny (20120303): "Struck the wrong chord? Why did you send me a
message?"
dolf: "Because I had to convey aspects of life which are pertinent to
the consideration.
And I have approached you because we have spoken before.
If there is no interest I will look elsewhere. If needs be I'll look
overseas.
I'm getting an early night now mate.
I hope we chat again soon."
Nurse Fanny (20120303): "Short and sweet, just how I like it.
Look, I'm happy to meet with you, I don't have an agenda and defiantly
don't want your money.
Let's meet/chat and go from there.
Snooze time for a bit, then I'll get up and do an assignment.
All nighter...ugh"
dolf: "That's a great idea mate.
I have lots of free time. Let's catch up after Mardi Gras.
I've been busy plotting the overthrow of the Commonwealth--more on that
later."
This was now the 3rd occasion where this intrusion against me had
occurred and which I viewed as an unwanted, unreasoned and aggressive
conduct against my autonomy and rights under the State as a person of
intellect, integrity and dignity who is generally of a calm and happy
disposition. This conduct by them has unnecessarily tainted, prejudiced
and rendered toxic my living environment--goodness knows what
monstrosity the neighbours think of me.
Laing & Simmons
145 Victoria Street
Potts Point NSW 2011
29 March 2012 [Super: #436 / #76 - Strength's Warning Signs, Revealers
of Virtue; I-Ching: H20 - Contemplation; Tetra: 64 - Sinking, Ego: #480
/ #80 - Primitivist Independence, Remaining in Isolation; I-Ching: H16 -
Enthusiasm; Tetra: 23 - Ease]
Attention: Senior Property Manager
Thank-you for your advice regarding the breaking of a Tenancy Agreement
at the Unit 2, 67 Bayswater Rd, Rushcutters Bay due to an emergency need
by me to vacate because of attempts made against my life. You have
conveyed to me a requirement to pay the following:
Lease Break Tenancy Fee $33.00
Lease Break TRA Search Fee $44.00
Lease Break Advertising Fee $176.00
Lease Break letting Fee $440.00
Total Fees: $693.00
I believe that the keys were returned on 22 March 2012 and cleaning
contractors had undertaken an effectual cleaning of the premises by
Saturday 24 March 2012 where upon the premises had an opportunity to be
open for inspection by potential lessees.
These processes occurred whilst the rental owed on the premises were in
fact within a credit of $350 as per account Trust Account Receipt No:
123789 dated 21 February 2012 being rental of $1,850 from 21/02/2012 to
19/03/2012.
And in acknowledgement of my obligations and not to profit unfairly from
another’s misfortune, I enclose a money order for immediate fees. Apart
from a $33 Lease Break Tenancy Fee, there has not been any disadvantage
to other parties and particularly when access to the premises is
advertised on the company’s www-page.
Whilst you would care to remind me of every technical obligation I have
under the leasing agreement. That you have not sought to convey to me
any consideration of leniency due to the dire nature of the life
circumstances which mandated such early termination of lease.
That this evacuation was necessitated as a means of life preservation
were contributed by an earlier circumstance of the real estate agent
(Hayek) as a failure by a former property manager Ms. Dianne Touma to
secure the premises of Unit 8 / 108 Victoria Street, Potts
Point--following an allegedly unlawful, determined and forcible entry by
the New South Wales Police Service.
And that such failure as delinquency of a duty towards me, subsequently
resulted in a burglary of the insecure premises and a property loss to
me of some $16,000.
It was in the course of pursuing that loss against others, that this
departure was necessary. I feel, that it is now necessary to apportion
an appropriate blame in relation to that initial property loss against
Laing & Simmons.
And towards that legal claim is a fee of $50,000 to produce my www-page.
If you would be so kind as to forward to me release notice with respects
to the bond.
The matter will now be directed to lawyers.
SMS (+64 02 9356 365) @ 20120402 1208 hours: “If you have paid your rent
in the past few days please disregard this text. Your rent was due
19.3.12. Please pay $450.”
dolf: “As per my previous email and CD ROM to you.”
Senior Property Manager (Laing & Simmons): “The unit was opened for
inspection as soon as we could after you return the keys and it was
cleaned. The owner has approved an application which I previously
mentioned to you and this will commence from the 5.4.12.
I’m not sure what you mean in your email that have you have enclosed a
money order for the immediate fees but a money order cannot be attached
to an email??? Have you posted it?
Outstanding rent owing to the 4.4.12 is $564.30 plus the lease break
fees of $1143.00. The quote for the new door is $1850 + GST.
Please advise your intentions on payment for the above? Kind regards.”
dolf: “Which new door at the value of $1850 + GST are we talking about
and to which address are you referring by that financial reference?
Kind regards.”
Senior Property Manager (Laing & Simmons): “The unit door which is a
fire rated door, it needs to be replaced as it was damaged and no long
fire proof.
What do you mean by the financial reference? Is this the money you owe?”
dolf: “Are you suggesting that the "fire rated door" as the front
entrance to the property @ Alexander Unit 2 / 67 Bayswater Rd,
Rushcutters Bay had sustained damage as an indication of forcible entry,
without my knowledge and in my absence, as the determined actions by the
New South Wales police in the company of other parties?
Or by other persons?
And if there was unlawful, unauthorized and brutal intrusion into my
apartment at that address for which I was lawfully the tenant, when do
you think someone will show me due courtesy of such advice and knowledge
of any penetration into the apartment?
Or are you suggesting the "fire rated door" is the front entrance to the
property @ Unit 8 / 108 Victoria St, Potts Point which had sustained
damage as an indication of forcible entry, with my knowledge and in my
presence, as the determined actions by the New South Wales police in the
company of other parties?”
Senior Property Manager (Laing & Simmons): “I’m talking about 2 / 67
Bayswater Rd. As I mentioned this maybe claimable under insurance but I
can’t give you a definite answer on this until I know for sure. I know
nothing of why the police entered your apartment but under the laws they
must have had due cause.”
dolf: “Thank-you very kindly ma'am.
As this is the first notification of any forcible and non-consensual
penetration into the apartment of which I am aware. The New South Police
service have yet to give any explanation (nothing is contemptuously
inadequate) as to the "due cause" for such use of force under the State
Laws in deference to my own opinion of now 69+ pages.
I'm sorry for the inconvenience, I can now begin to understand the
difficulty the present owner has faced and do thank them for their
patience--And I do apologize for this travesty.
Before I begin to resolve what I can, prior to referring matters for
legal advice and litigation, could you just confirm one more thing and
that is in relation to the credit of $350 as per account Trust Account
Receipt No: 123789 dated 21 February 2012.
What is the meaning of that credit reference on that rental receipt of
that date? And in the normal course of events, what is the day such
credit would expire, if it were considered as a rental payment?”
Senior Property Manager (Laing & Simmons): “I have just forwarded you a
copy of your rent ledger, you can see from this that rent is paid to the
19.3.12 with a credit of $350, which means you have $350 towards rent
for the week commencing the 20.3.12. I have entered the vacate date of
4.4.12 into our system and the computer calculates the rent owing up to
this date and takes into account the $350.”
dolf: “Thank-you so much for your prompt and meaningful assistance.
Following which I would conclude that the respective parties: Laing &
Simmons (Hayek) Real Estate and myself have all sustained damages,
losses and costs as a consequence of unreasonable police manoeuvres and
actions.
I think given my earlier view: "that the keys were returned on 22 March
2012 and cleaning contractors had undertaken an effectual cleaning of
the premises by Saturday 24 March 2012 where upon the premises had an
opportunity to be open for inspection by potential lessees before the
rent was again due on Monday 27 March 2012."
That all of those costs (which I do not deny you) are more appropriately
directed to the New South Wales police service for their attention and
payment in relation to any sustained damages, losses and costs.
If you could ensure that the Lease Break Tenancy Application is lodged
with the Fee $33.00 as Money Order which has previously been sent to you
via Australia Post.
I will burn another CD ROM for you containing these statements and
return the Rental Transaction Card via Australia Post.”
Senior Property Manager (Laing & Simmons): “If the Police Force are
going to take responsibility for the costs of you breaking your lease
and damage to the apartment door I need this in writing from them.
Otherwise you will be responsible for the costs in breaking the lease
agreement early.
The property was first advertised and opened on the 24.3.12 and an
application was approved by the owner on the 26.3.12 with this applicant
moving in on the 5.4.12.”
dolf: “That certainly is a perspective I will be taking over
"responsibility for the costs of my breaking the lease and damage to the
apartment door" and I too am looking for statements from the NSW police
about the reasonableness of their manoeuvres and actions.
If I may make a further suggestion: "If you could deduct from the
outstanding bond: the amount of $564.30 as the rent owing to the
landlord until the 4 April 2012. I do not make such payment as a rental
consideration of any acceptance by me over any liability to meet those
additional financial obligations or either to mitigate damages owed to
any parties, but do so as a gratuity towards the owner in the situation
of their dire circumstance. And that the rest of the bond is then
released to me.”
I will tomorrow begin to prepare the briefing notes for my legal
representatives.”
Senior Property Manager (Laing & Simmons): “I’m unable to release the
difference in the bond amount as you have broken your lease agreement
and the landlord needs to be compensated for this. What you’ll need to
do is pay the lease break fees and make a claim against the Police Force
to recover these fees if necessary.”
dolf: “Then I have done all the good that I can do and I will
accordingly apportion the disrespect to my word, bond and to myself to
other parties.”
Senior Property Manager (Laing & Simmons): “I don’t understand what
you’re saying??”
These grievous incursions by State Authorities who have no desire to
give any accountability for their actions and neither do they wish to
grant me a modicum of credence with respects to my religious belief as
being a substantial reality. Accordingly, I have left both Sydney and
the State of New South Wales with no intention of ever returning to
their culture of disrespect, which lacks civility in its inhumanity. I
have therefore terminated my lease and left 3rd parties to pack and
convey my goods and chattels interstate at a cost of over $4,000. Given
this my book has now reached a level of completeness. I believe that
such actions by me as public defiance of the State’s conduct which I
have taken with due consideration as a calculated exercise of voluntary
will accompanying determined action against them, will invariably
manifest a disturbing effect and consequence upon their enjoyment as
participation in any further ANZAC celebrations.
As I crossed the State border into Victoria as a safer haven from their
persecutions and traumatising conduct, I advised those parties of my
intention to leave the State.
This departure gave me an opportunity to meet a female friend of Private
Jake Kovco who had some life experiences which augmented mine. There was
no disagreement about the plausibility of any aspect about my belief
that Kovco’s conduct was deliberate and being passed off as accidental.
His making of a video record of his service was in itself an unusual
act. I formed the view from the sloppy and casual manner by which he
portrayed himself that it seemed different to how other soldiers are
normally portrayed in the media.
The casualness as his routine conduct was at odds with his disruption of
determined policy events. That the uncharacteristic behaviour about his
making of the video record seems to support the notion as a view he
held, that the Australian soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan were
forgotten by the general populace, who went about their lives as though
they weren’t there and what they were doing wasn’t important. He was in
fact undertaking a course of action which required complex processes
that were not normal for him. That his intention to have his body return
on ANZAC day was a dishonourable and opportunistic conduct as an attempt
to impose himself upon the State in a most undignified manner.
That I was right to protest as I had done and what a waste of time and
money the Military Tribunals into his death were.
Also conveyed to me was an equivalent experience to my own, about
private sexual acts being recorded by others and unbeknownst to
ourselves, were then publicised amongst a group in an attempt to
dishonour a person’s dignity and privacy--That this was technically a
rape because the sexual act accompanied a video recording which was made
against a person’s will.
Have you met my kangaroo Jingoist bitch prostitute: Shane Dowling?
Shane Dowling (Kangaroo Jingoist Bitch Prostitute): "We know what you
mean by Faceless Men, Krudd, you anti-termite, errrrhm semite.....Coz
Mark Arsebib, is just an ass-licker.” [7 March 2012, Shane Dowling alias
Kangaroo Court Australia @ ***@gmail.com]
The dolt defamation on the Internet is going to come to an end!
Shane Dowling (Kangaroo Jingoist Bitch Prostitute): “[With opposition]
101 [asks “Does the Zionist Lobby have blood on its hands in
Australia?”] [7 March 2012, Shane Dowling alias Kangaroo Court Australia
@ ***@gmail.com]
Semantics!
- dolf